According to @EmberCN, Gate executed a Q4 2025 on-chain burn of 2,163,900 GT worth about $22.28M, which is visible on Etherscan at https://etherscan.io/tx/0x03773d485c05dc26a541f5d74e15097d02e010dea34c5cc4f6d3a127ac0126ce. According to @EmberCN, Gate’s burns are conducted quarterly and cumulative GT destroyed since 2019 totals 184.8M from a 300M max supply. Based on @EmberCN’s figures, the outstanding GT supply is now roughly 115M with an estimated market cap of $1.186B, and this Q4 burn removed approximately 1.85% of the pre-burn outstanding supply.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, Uniswap burned 100M UNI (about $627M), representing roughly 10% of the total supply, with an on-chain transaction link provided by the source. source: @OnchainDataNerd The reported supply reduction is a material deflationary event that traders can factor into UNI supply-demand models, liquidity assumptions, and price discovery frameworks. source: @OnchainDataNerd Traders may monitor UNI spot liquidity, perpetual funding and basis, and Uniswap pool depth for volatility and slippage around the burn timing referenced by the source. source: @OnchainDataNerd Execution note: confirm the burn’s on-chain timestamp via the transaction reference provided by the source before initiating momentum or mean-reversion strategies. source: @OnchainDataNerd

According to Lookonchain, after Uniswap’s fee burn proposal was approved, the Uniswap treasury executed an on-chain burn of 100,000,000 UNI valued at about 591 million dollars roughly 4 hours ago. Source: Lookonchain on X; Arkham Intelligence. On-chain data from the Uniswap treasury address 0x1a9C8182C09F50C8318d769245beA52c32BE35BC shows UNI being sent to a burn address, confirming the reported burn transaction. Source: Lookonchain on X; Arkham Intelligence. Traders should track UNI spot liquidity, slippage on major Uniswap pools, and derivatives funding and open interest for immediate market response to the burn event. Source: Lookonchain on X; Arkham Intelligence. Further monitoring of the treasury address and governance implementation activity can help identify any follow-on transfers related to the fee burn rollout. Source: Lookonchain on X; Arkham Intelligence.

According to @EmberCN, Uniswap executed an on-chain burn of 100,000,000 UNI (about $596 million) from the Uniswap treasury at around 04:30 today, confirmed by Etherscan transaction 0x091f0083242a777d55821c1189e568d6d033d9da501b75087dc736fa143d2c1e. Source: https://twitter.com/EmberCN/status/2005072023362666511; https://etherscan.io/tx/0x091f0083242a777d55821c1189e568d6d033d9da501b75087dc736fa143d2c1e The author adds that the fee-burn proposal passed two days earlier and that future Uniswap protocol fees will be used to burn UNI, establishing an ongoing supply-reduction mechanism. Source: https://twitter.com/EmberCN/status/2005072023362666511 Based on the UNI contract showing a total supply of 1,000,000,000, the burn equals roughly 10 percent of supply, a material tokenomics change traders can factor into liquidity and valuation models. Source: https://etherscan.io/token/0x1f9840a85d5aF5bf1D1762F925BDADdC4201F984 Traders can monitor subsequent burns and fee accruals via the on-chain burn transactions and Uniswap analytics to gauge the pace of supply contraction and DEX revenue trends. Source: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x091f0083242a777d55821c1189e568d6d033d9da501b75087dc736fa143d2c1e; https://info.uniswap.org

According to @CoinMarketCap, Uniswap's UNIfication proposal to turn on the protocol's fee switch and burn 100 million UNI was approved on Thursday, with 125.3 million UNI voting in favor and only 742 UNI against. According to @CoinMarketCap, the vote outcome indicates overwhelming DAO support for enabling the protocol fee mechanism and executing a 100 million UNI burn, key parameters that directly affect token supply and protocol fee policy.

According to @MikeSilagadze, 2026 will be dominated by a revenue and fundamentals meta, with tokens that have sensible value accrual massively outperforming source: https://twitter.com/MikeSilagadze/status/2004307828249710804. He highlighted Hayden Adams’ update that Uniswap’s Unification vote concluded with 125,342,017 YES and 742 NO source: https://x.com/haydenzadams/status/2004265701083918475. Per Adams, after an approximately two-day timelock, 100 million UNI will be burned, protocol fee switches will be flipped on, and Uniswap Labs will turn off frontend fees to focus on the protocol source: https://x.com/haydenzadams/status/2004265701083918475.

According to @alice_und_bob, deploying a Solidity ERC-20 token that implements a Burnable interface immediately surfaced a tokens burnt indicator on a block explorer after execution, demonstrating real-time indexing of burn events for ETH-based assets, source: @alice_und_bob on X, Dec 23, 2025. Burnable contracts reduce totalSupply when burn functions are called, enabling direct on-chain tracking of supply changes that traders can monitor for tokenomics analysis, source: OpenZeppelin Docs, ERC20Burnable. Block explorers reflect confirmed on-chain events quickly by reading blockchain data, allowing traders to observe burn transactions and update circulating supply dashboards without delay, source: ethereum.org, Block explorers.

According to CoinMarketCap, GAIMINglobal completed a 1.22 billion GMRX token burn labeled as 2025’s final deflationary event (source: CoinMarketCap social post, Dec 10, 2025). Average node uptime increased from 37 hours to 393 hours after the GAIMIN Launcher upgrade, a roughly 10.6x rise (source: CoinMarketCap social post, Dec 10, 2025). The group executed a strategic split: GAIMIN will target B2C gaming while Orbon Cloud becomes the infrastructure unit (source: CoinMarketCap social post, Dec 10, 2025).

According to @jp_mullin888, 625 million ERC-20 OM tokens were burned and holders are instructed to migrate to the OM mainnet immediately; source: @jp_mullin888 on X, Dec 5, 2025. Traders should align positioning with the migration notice and verify the burn on-chain and any exchange updates before executing orders; source: @jp_mullin888 on X, Dec 5, 2025.

According to @lookonchain, the Aster buyback wallet burned 77.86 million ASTER valued at 79.81 million USD about one hour ago. Source: twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1996748962846658885 The wallet address 0x02DCd5b2DdE0F6edb4B797DA468fBc52F23f49Dc shows the related transaction on Arkham Intelligence, confirming the reported amount and timing. Source: intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x02DCd5b2DdE0F6edb4B797DA468fBc52F23f49Dc Token burns permanently reduce circulating supply, a factor traders track for liquidity and volatility around ASTER markets. Source: binance.com/en/academy/articles/what-is-a-coin-burn

According to @PeckShieldAlert, approximately $2.4 million was recovered by burning the hacker’s $pxETH, with the same amount minted back to the Redacted Cartel multisig on Dec 1, 2025, source: @PeckShieldAlert. The burn removes attacker-held pxETH from circulation while the remint consolidates the recovered amount under the Redacted Cartel multisig for custody, source: @PeckShieldAlert. Traders can monitor the Redacted Cartel multisig for subsequent on-chain transfers related to pxETH to gauge post-recovery flows, source: @PeckShieldAlert.

According to @cas_abbe, Aster DEX posted 30-day perps volume of $258 billion, 30-day DEX volume of $3.58 billion, and $54 million in fees, with $ASTER buybacks totaling 41 million over the period. Source: @cas_abbe on X, Nov 30, 2025. According to @cas_abbe, Aster plans to continue buybacks alongside a token burn, which the author highlights as a supply-side catalyst relevant for $ASTER liquidity and trading. Source: @cas_abbe on X, Nov 30, 2025. According to @cas_abbe, the Binance Blockchain event next month is a watchlist catalyst for possible $ASTER-related updates. Source: @cas_abbe on X, Nov 30, 2025.

According to Lookonchain, wallet 0xb13a minted 1,000,000,000 PORT3 and sold 162,750,000 PORT3 for 199.56 BNB (about $166,000). Source: Lookonchain (X, Nov 23, 2025). Before the selling was completed, the PORT3 team pulled liquidity and multiple exchanges paused PORT3 deposits. Source: Lookonchain (X, Nov 23, 2025). The attacker then burned the remaining 837,250,000 PORT3; the referenced wallet is 0xb13a503da5f368e48577c87b5d5aec73d08f812e. Source: Lookonchain (X, Nov 23, 2025).

According to @OnchainLens, the PORT3 exploiter burned the remaining 837.25 million PORT3 tokens valued at $6.76 million on Nov 22, 2025, based on Nansen on-chain data. Per Nansen data cited by @OnchainLens, this action eliminates that wallet’s immediate sell supply and removes exploiter-held tokens from circulation. According to Nansen, traders can monitor PORT3 spot and DEX liquidity, exchange deposit alerts, and related on-chain flows via Nansen analytics to assess post-burn liquidity and volatility. Using figures shared by @OnchainLens and Nansen, the reported values imply an approximate reference price of about $0.0081 per PORT3 at the time of the burn.

According to @cas_abbe, $ASTER has printed higher highs and higher lows this month while the broader market fell, signaling relative strength for traders to note, source: @cas_abbe on X, Nov 22, 2025. The author attributes this resilience to buybacks, stating Aster DEX purchased nearly 40M ASTER in November and plans to burn about half of those tokens, source: @cas_abbe on X, Nov 22, 2025. The author reports that buybacks have now stopped and are scheduled to resume on December 10, removing a near-term source of demand and raising the risk of a corrective move if market momentum weakens, source: @cas_abbe on X, Nov 22, 2025. The author also states Aster is generating 2.5M-3M dollars in daily fees, which they cite as funding for the next buyback wave and a potential upside catalyst, and they frame any dips before buybacks resume as buying opportunities, source: @cas_abbe on X, Nov 22, 2025.

According to @CoinMarketCap, UNI initially jumped 43% to 10.05 after Uniswap proposed a fee switch that routes protocol fees to UNI burns, source: @CoinMarketCap on X. The proposal includes a retroactive burn of 100 million UNI, equal to 10% of the treasury from the beginning, source: @CoinMarketCap on X. For V2, liquidity providers receive 0.25% while a 0.05% protocol fee is directed to UNI burn, source: @CoinMarketCap on X. For V3, 0.01% and 0.05% fee tiers send one quarter of LP fees to UNI burn, while 0.30% and 1% tiers send one sixth of LP fees, source: @CoinMarketCap on X. It also allocates 100% of Unichain sequencer fees to burn, estimated at about 7.5 million dollars annualized before L1 data costs and a 15% share to Optimism, and includes aggregator hook fees for V4 pools, source: @CoinMarketCap on X. A Protocol Fee Discount Auction lets bidders win time-limited zero-fee swaps with the winning bid burned and is estimated to raise LP returns by about 0.06 to 0.26 dollars per 10,000 dollars traded, source: @CoinMarketCap on X. Other items include zero fees for frontend, wallet, and API, and a 2% UNI allocation of 20 million vested quarterly to fund protocol growth, source: @CoinMarketCap on X.

According to @justinsuntron, he posted the message 'Talk less. Burn more!' on Nov 11, 2025 and linked to a DeFi_JUST post, without specifying any asset, burn amount, or timeline (source: twitter.com/justinsuntron/status/1988212979716997421; source: x.com/DeFi_JUST/status/1988143404518179307). For trading, the absence of details means there is no verifiable supply change to price in yet; monitor the same X handles for follow-up announcements that name the asset, quantify the burn, and provide a schedule before positioning (source: twitter.com/justinsuntron/status/1988212979716997421; source: x.com/DeFi_JUST/status/1988143404518179307).

According to @CoinMarketCap, a Nov 11, 2025 post asked Buyback and Burn Meta?, highlighting market attention on token buyback-and-burn mechanisms (source: CoinMarketCap on X, Nov 11, 2025). Token buyback-and-burn typically involves a project repurchasing tokens and sending them to an irrecoverable burn address to reduce circulating supply, a structural factor traders can quantify (source: Binance Academy, What Is a Token Burn?). BNB implements an Auto-Burn that permanently removes BNB each quarter using a disclosed formula tied to on-chain data and price, with transactions recorded on-chain for verification (source: Binance.com, BNB Auto-Burn methodology and quarterly burn announcements). ETH burns base fees under EIP-1559, making net supply changes observable via public metrics that traders track for issuance dynamics (source: Ethereum.org, EIP-1559 fee market change). For trading execution, prioritize issuer announcements, published buyback schedules, and on-chain burn transaction hashes to measure realized supply contraction and timing rather than inferring price direction without data (source: Binance BNB quarterly burn reports; Ethereum.org EIP-1559 references).

According to the source, the Uniswap Foundation announced a governance proposal to activate Uniswap protocol fees and implement UNI token burns, while restructuring the ecosystem under a unified development model led by Uniswap Labs, source: Uniswap Foundation governance announcement. For traders, protocol fees establish on-chain revenue and token burns reduce circulating UNI, making governance voting and rollout milestones key catalysts to monitor for UNI price, liquidity, and funding dynamics, source: Uniswap Foundation governance announcement.

According to @ki_young_ju, Uniswap (UNI) could go parabolic if the protocol fee switch is activated, citing roughly $1T in year-to-date volume for v2 and v3 and estimating about $500M in annual burns if volume holds (source: @ki_young_ju on X, Nov 11, 2025). He adds that exchanges hold about $830M worth of UNI, implying a potential supply shock even with unlocks if the burn mechanism turns on (source: @ki_young_ju on X, Nov 11, 2025).